I'm strongly against strategy game where raiding especially pirate attacks from boats would make the difference who's winning who's not. Of course you can do this already now, but it's not so big danger because if opponent happens to get your town you can get it back, but with raizing your town would be in ashes in time you get back. The main hero would stay town waiting for better troops and waiting for other players to attack, just sitting there. If everybody uses because it's so easy: Hire hero, give some creatures and go attack. You're right oldtimer there are strategic choices concerning raiding/raizing.īut I say that it should be a strategic way not bad habit. Send Instant Message | Send E-Mail | View Profile | Quote Reply | Link

It would take couple of days to move the resources and troops to another town and if the town is conquered during the move, the new owner would get both the resources and the creatures which were in the move. Transporting would work like the new 'vectoring' of units. Each town would have their own warehouse and silo to have the resources and if you would like to build something in town which don't have needed resources you would need to move them from some other town. This would of course create new idea of moving resources between towns.

I really like idea that you would get portion of opponent resources when you take over the town. Some quick units could raize towns with ease and would cause people to just be standing in their own towns defending them rather than adventuring and trying to conquer others. I think because of the new fog of war it would be impossible to defend your town efficiently if you don't have scout and watcher towers all over your territory.

Age of wonder 3 raize lost heros